All comments of User Senior Ranger

Semen Facials? I imagine an editorial meeting. Publisher, editor, reporters, writers at a conference table in a quiet corporate office. Ideas for stories, opinion pieces, etc. are being bandied about, judged, criticized, evaluated, expanded upon. One promising writer suggests he’d like to do a piece about men ejaculating semen onto the faces of women. What looks good, what doesn’t look good, what’s the right amount, what is the role of the women, etc.? Only in JAV! As I read this piece I could not stop thinking how bizarre it is for men to be discussing details of depositing semen onto the faces of women. It seems so out of the course of everyday discourse. Imagine a man getting home from work, and his wife saying, “Honey, will you please squirt your love juice on my face tonight? I’m having lunch with the girls tomorrow, and I want to look my best." The dictionary definition of “facial” is: “a treatment to improve the condition or appearance of the facial skin.” I guess in the realm of adult entertainment, a semen facial may improve the appearance of the facial skin. Many of us like the way a woman looks with fresh semen in her eyes and dripping off her nose and chin. For me, I’m much less interested in the technical details of how much and where than I am the why. What’s the psychology that makes a facial so appealing to so many? Is this a common practice in “real life” or is it only an adult video thing? What are the origins? Memory is imperfect, but I don’t recall seeing such things in the old 8mm film “smoker” days. Was it part of the Linda Lovelace “Deep Throat” advance in adult entertainment? While there is clearly a dominance aspect, is there also an elemental disrespect element to it? Do only submissive women want it? Do any women really want it? Is the man arrogantly denying the woman’s desire to have that semen sloshing around her uterus? “Yeah, the power of your pussy brought it out of me, but I’ll decide where it goes, bitch!” Many women seem to smile after the act, and I wonder if it’s prideful — “I made this happen.” Other women seem to hate the whole thing. Would an audience prefer to see the woman hate it or love it? So many questions. I clearly should have been at that editorial meeting!! One thing the blog writer did not discuss was the outdoors display that sometimes happens. I haven’t seen it in JAV, but there’s a whole sub-genre of WAV where women are sprayed, then paraded around outside. I once did this with a very submissive woman — shot up her face then took her out to dinner at a nice restaurant. Odd looks ensued, but I’m not sure how many folks actually suspected the reality. My woman certainly had a delicious sense of shaming. For a long, long time I’ve had a fantasy that I had a wife who loved sucking off random guys. She’d get a facial out of it, and immediately I’d take a picture of her proud, smiling face posed next to the dick that did the deed. In our older years, we would have albums filled with these photos and we’d spend time together looking at them and reliving facials of the past. There’s some strange psychology to explore! If I have any criticism of this blog, it’s that the writer seems to presume his preferences are generally universal. I don’t think they are. It is a fascinating topic, and I’d like to see more written about it.

Orgasm Fantasies? Really, who dreams this stuff up? Yes, adult video entertainment is fundamentally fantasy, but to suggest the imposition of reality upon it seems truly delusional. You’re going to “improve” the female orgasm in JAV? Frankly, this almost offends me. The Japanese actresses I’ve seen do a marvelous job of communicating an orgasm. They ramp up the oral messaging, they often declare they are “cumming,” and they have perfected a very pronounced display of pelvic spasming that is damn convincing. We cannot know if it’s a genuine orgasm, but this is acting, after all. You rarely see such a convincing display in WAV (Western Adult Video). To suggest that “squirting” is the key to making it more dramatic may provide more fantasy, but when I see it in JAV it’s so unrealistic as to be laughable. The reality of “squirting” is that a few women may do it as their muscle spasms pressure the bladder and cause a modest amount of fluid to forcefully eject from the urethra. This is the equivalent of a good belly laugh. These endless streams of fluid in videos would be better aimed at a toilet. The argument that this is more than pure piss is based on an analysis showing the presence of a tiny amount of a seminal-type fluid from the Skene’s gland. This fluid is typically present inside the vagina and is secreted from the vaginal walls. Typically, this is the white fluid seen leaking from a sexually aroused vagina. Comparing the female orgasm to the male equivalent is not just apples to oranges, it’s comparing football to war. The male has the same pelvic muscle spasms, but there is also a forceful ejection of seminal fluid — and once it finishes, he is finished for usually an hour or two in the most virile men and up to a day in oldsters. These videos you see where men are orgasming repeatedly are pure fantasy. And as for the amount of semen, I laughed out loud when I read “the amount that comes out can be vast.” Yes, vast in that fantasy realm, but reality is a different story. Typical volume of semen ejaculated is one-third to one teaspoon. That translates to 0.17 fluid ounce. A shot glass holds 1.5 fluid ounces so it would take 10 guys to fill a simple shot glass. Hardly “vast,” in the real world. Like it or not the fundamental purpose of the sex act is to get the semen out of the male and into the female — procreation. We are programmed by millenia to understand this as the climax — the deed is done. The female orgasm exists to give her a reason to participate in an act so unbecoming to begin with. In boxing terms, the female orgasm is on the undercard, and, outside of the female domination arena, it can never be elevated to a main event.

The question for me is not whether real or imagined tits are better, but why do tits matter at all? I acknowledge the powerful visual allure of tits, although I can't imagine the underlying cause of it. Men have what I consider an inordinate interest in tits, but most women also find them erotically suggestive. If you showed me a picture of tits, I'll look at it, but I'd also look at a picture of a furry dog or cat. And if I could only pet one, I'd choose the cat or dog. Playing with tits really does little for me; nice I suppose if it elicits a suggestive moan, but that's about it. Obsessing at the level of comparing real vs imagined tits enters a fantasy realm I can't fathom. Zenra, while providing a service I appreciate, has some strange aspects. This obsession with tits is one of them. To each his own, I suppose, as my obsession is pussy. There is just so much more to it, and it provides dramatically more sensory satisfaction. In the end, you go to your church, and I'll go to mine.

In response to Senior Ranger 's comment

A "moonshiner" may not drink moonshine at all.

Fetish? First, I do not consider either of these interest areas as “fetish.” But more on that later. Personally, I have no interest in the student theme. It always strikes me as too close to a very questionable area, and the implied power imbalance is unsettling. The rogue wife, on the other hand, is perhaps my most powerful preference. I’m a born cuckold so nothing is more titillating to me than a wife having sex with others. I’ve lived that experience so it’s not just a fantasy. There are two directions this path can lead, storywise. First, the loyal, loving wife who is overwhelmed by her lust and cannot resist sex with another. Her final embrace of unbridled lust over loyalty is the crux of this plot. The other is the “hot wife” or “slut wife,” the woman who craves sex for sex sake and consumes it like an moonshiner drinks moonshine. This is a recognition that women not only have a strong sex drive but also can have an insatiable appetite for it. Both fascinate me, but the power of lust has more allure and carries more credibility overall in the realm of fiction. In real life, I want a woman who marries me because we love each other — and we’re both committed to her sexual gratifications outside the marriage. Nothing more thrilling to me than helping my wife get ready for a date, then spending the evening knowing she’s out there fucking and enjoying herself. As for fetish, I object to this word evolving to be synonymous with “obsession.” Nothing I can do about that; language changes. But this development is recent, and in the world I grew up in, “fetish” carried the traditional meaning of “object.” Sexually, you could have a shoe fetish or a foot fetish or a panty fetish — it always involved some object. That object may be a body part or it may be an inanimate object, but for almost 500 years it was related to an object. Anyway, that’s my little rant on language. -lightly edited by admin